The main argument of Google Ireland Ltd.’s defense is the reflection on the “unfeasibility” of the plaintiff’s demands. Pavel Bagryantsev. representing the interests of Google LLC.
Also casually called the plaintiff’s demands unfeasible.
Almost the entire speech rcs data of the lawyer representing Google Ireland Ltd.. Maxim Yuzhakov. was devoted to the impossibility of their execution.
44 and Tatyana Marshanova due to the deactivation (the participants in the process persistently call it blocking) of Russian AdSense accounts and the impossibility of “forcing” Google to show ads on the plaintiff’s channel. He noted that the framework nature of the AdSense agreement does not oblige the American corporation to place ads in the partner’s content. but guarantees payments if ads do appear.
Having heard the defendants’ arguments. Judge Anna Mishchenko drew attention to the fact that the plaintiff’s demands must be enforceable at the time of the court’s decision and recommended that the plaintiff clarify discover the key roles and them. Tatyana Marshanova agreed. and the court postponed the hearing until May 14. 2025.
According to Alexey Pustovit.
Managing partner of the Yug law firm. changing the subject of a claim. when the plaintiff changes one claim to the defendant for another during the process. is a common situation.
“The judge has no right to tell the plaintiff that his demands are unenforceable. since this essentially means that the fans data judge. before making a decision. informed the plaintiff in advance that he would deny his claim. The Code of Judicial Ethics prohibits this. But the judge. having found out what exactly the violation of the plaintiff’s rights consists of and how the plaintiff wants to restore these rights. can offer the plaintiff to clarify the claims.” concluded Alexey Pustovit.